@inproceedings{song-liu-2020-yong,
title = "用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题{---}{---}以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of {``}{T}ales of the {M}arshes{''}: Comparing with {``}{P}ingyaozhuan{''} of {L}uo {G}uanzhong)",
author = "Song, Li and
Liu, Ying",
editor = "Sun, Maosong and
Li, Sujian and
Zhang, Yue and
Liu, Yang",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics",
month = oct,
year = "2020",
address = "Haikou, China",
publisher = "Chinese Information Processing Society of China",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.ccl-1.5",
pages = "43--53",
abstract = "《水浒传》是独著还是合著,施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。本文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。",
language = "Chinese",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="song-liu-2020-yong">
<titleInfo>
<title>用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Li</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Song</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ying</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<language>
<languageTerm type="text">Chinese</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">chi</languageTerm>
</language>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maosong</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sun</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sujian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Chinese Information Processing Society of China</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Haikou, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>《水浒传》是独著还是合著,施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。本文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">song-liu-2020-yong</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.ccl-1.5</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>43</start>
<end>53</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T 用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong)
%A Song, Li
%A Liu, Ying
%Y Sun, Maosong
%Y Li, Sujian
%Y Zhang, Yue
%Y Liu, Yang
%S Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics
%D 2020
%8 October
%I Chinese Information Processing Society of China
%C Haikou, China
%G Chinese
%F song-liu-2020-yong
%X 《水浒传》是独著还是合著,施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。本文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.ccl-1.5
%P 43-53
Markdown (Informal)
[用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong)](https://aclanthology.org/2020.ccl-1.5) (Song & Liu, CCL 2020)
ACL